2004 Dodge Durango vs. 2010 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2010 Nissan Frontier is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Durango. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Durango would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Frontier (257 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Durango. (230 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Durango.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Durango (393 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan Frontier. (281 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan Frontier.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Durango | 2010 Nissan Frontier | |
Make | Dodge | Nissan |
Model | Durango | Frontier |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 3953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 257 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 281 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1860 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.5 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 17 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |