2004 Dodge Durango vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Durango. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Durango would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Durango weights approximately 661 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Dodge Durango. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Durango (319 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Dodge Durango | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Dodge | Mini |
| Model | Durango | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2119 kg | 1458 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.4 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 47 L |
