2004 Dodge Grand Caravan vs. 1951 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2004 Dodge Grand Caravan is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Grand Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1951 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Grand Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Grand Caravan | 1951 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Grand Caravan | XK |
Year Released | 2004 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2600 mm |