2004 Dodge Grand Caravan vs. 1976 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Dodge Grand Caravan is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Grand Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Grand Caravan weights approximately 822 kg more than 1976 Toyota Celica.
Because 1976 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Grand Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Grand Caravan | 1976 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Grand Caravan | Celica |
Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1847 kg | 1025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2510 mm |