2004 Dodge Grand Caravan vs. 1982 Dodge 600
To start off, 2004 Dodge Grand Caravan is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Grand Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Grand Caravan (216 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Grand Caravan should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Grand Caravan weights approximately 682 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Grand Caravan (332 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (158 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Grand Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Grand Caravan | 1982 Dodge 600 | |
Make | Dodge | Dodge |
Model | Grand Caravan | 600 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 158 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1847 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2630 mm |