2004 Dodge Intrepid vs. 2010 Holden UTE

To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Intrepid. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Intrepid would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Intrepid. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Intrepid.

Because 2010 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Intrepid, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Intrepid. (258 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Intrepid. 2004 Dodge Intrepid has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2010 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Dodge Intrepid will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: