2004 Dodge Neon vs. 1968 Holden Monaro
To start off, 2004 Dodge Neon is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Holden Monaro (215 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Neon. (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Holden Monaro should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Neon.
Because 1968 Holden Monaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Monaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Monaro (443 Nm) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Neon. (176 Nm). This means 1968 Holden Monaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Neon | 1968 Holden Monaro | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Neon | Monaro |
Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 5354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 443 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2830 mm |