2004 Dodge Neon vs. 1969 Opel GT
To start off, 2004 Dodge Neon is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Opel GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Opel GT would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Neon (231 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1969 Opel GT. (101 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1969 Opel GT.
Because 1969 Opel GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Opel GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Neon (339 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Opel GT. (157 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Opel GT.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Neon | 1969 Opel GT | |
Make | Dodge | Opel |
Model | Neon | GT |
Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 1900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 231 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 157 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 69.8 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.8 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 53 L |