2004 Dodge Neon vs. 1969 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Dodge Neon is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Neon (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1969 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1969 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Neon weights approximately 1 kg more than 1969 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Triumph 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Triumph 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Neon (176 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Neon | 1969 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Dodge | Triumph |
Model | Neon | 2000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1171 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 64 L |