2004 Dodge Neon vs. 1980 Ferrari 512 BB
To start off, 2004 Dodge Neon is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ferrari 512 BB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ferrari 512 BB would be higher. At 4,942 cc, 1980 Ferrari 512 BB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Ferrari 512 BB (355 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Neon. (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Ferrari 512 BB should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Ferrari 512 BB weights approximately 281 kg more than 2004 Dodge Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Ferrari 512 BB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Ferrari 512 BB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Ferrari 512 BB (460 Nm) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Neon. (176 Nm). This means 1980 Ferrari 512 BB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Dodge Neon | 1980 Ferrari 512 BB | |
| Make | Dodge | Ferrari |
| Model | Neon | 512 BB |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 4942 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 355 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 460 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1171 kg | 1452 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1130 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 110 L |
