2004 Dodge Neon vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2004 Dodge Neon is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Neon (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Neon weights approximately 349 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Dodge Neon | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Dodge | Volvo |
| Model | Neon | 66 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1171 kg | 822 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1390 mm |
