2004 Dodge Neon vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Dodge Neon is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Neon (231 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (62 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Neon weights approximately 400 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Neon (339 Nm) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (118 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Neon | 1991 Renault Clio | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | Neon | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 1991 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 231 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 118 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 23.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.8 L/100km | 5.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 4.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 43 L |