2004 Dodge Neon vs. 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320
To start off, 2004 Dodge Neon is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 (216 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Neon. (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 weights approximately 319 kg more than 2004 Dodge Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 (310 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Neon. (176 Nm). This means 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Neon | 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Neon | 320 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 216 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 310 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1171 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.5 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.4 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 70 L |