2004 Dodge Neon vs. 2007 Holden Epica
To start off, 2007 Holden Epica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Neon (231 HP) has 78 more horse power than 2007 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 2007 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Neon (339 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Neon | 2007 Holden Epica | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Neon | Epica |
Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 231 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |