2004 Dodge Neon vs. 2008 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 35 kg more than 2004 Dodge Neon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Neon (339 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Fiat Bravo. (206 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Neon | 2008 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Dodge | Fiat |
Model | Neon | Bravo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 1368 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 231 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 206 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 58 L |