2004 Dodge Neon vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Rover 75 (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Neon. (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 345 kg more than 2004 Dodge Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (215 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Neon. (176 Nm). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Neon | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Dodge | Rover |
Model | Neon | 75 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 215 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 1536 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.4 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 65 L |