2004 Dodge Neon vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Neon (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Clio weights approximately 4 kg more than 2004 Dodge Neon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Clio (200 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Neon. (176 Nm). This means 2010 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Neon | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | Neon | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 200 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 17.9:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1171 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.4 L/100km | 4.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 55 L |