2004 Dodge Neon vs. 2012 Citroen C3
To start off, 2012 Citroen C3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Neon (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C3. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Neon weights approximately 48 kg more than 2012 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Neon (176 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Citroen C3. (161 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Neon | 2012 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Dodge | Citroen |
Model | Neon | C3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 161 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 82 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1171 kg | 1123 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.4 L/100km | 4.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 45 L |