2004 Dodge Neon vs. 2013 Dodge DART
To start off, 2013 Dodge DART is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Neon would be higher. Both 2004 Dodge Neon and 2013 Dodge DART are equipped with a 1,999 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge DART (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Neon. (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge DART should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge DART weights approximately 268 kg more than 2004 Dodge Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge DART (197 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Neon. (176 Nm). This means 2013 Dodge DART will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Dodge Neon | 2013 Dodge DART | |
| Make | Dodge | Dodge |
| Model | Neon | DART |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 197 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 82 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1171 kg | 1439 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4672 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1465 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2703 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 6.5 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 8.1 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 60 L |
