2004 Dodge Neon vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford C-MAX (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Neon. (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 583 kg more than 2004 Dodge Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Neon (176 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (175 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Neon | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Neon | C-MAX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 12.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1171 kg | 1754 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2085 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1621 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 6.5 L/100km | 2.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.1 L/100km | 2.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 53 L |