2004 Dodge Neon vs. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 2,998 cc (24 cylinders), 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Neon (231 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander. (227 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 385 kg more than 2004 Dodge Neon.
Because 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Dodge Neon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Neon (339 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander. (292 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Neon | 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Neon | Outlander |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 24 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 231 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 292 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4665 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 11 L/100km |