2004 Dodge Ram vs. 1965 Saab MC
To start off, 2004 Dodge Ram is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Saab MC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Saab MC would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Ram (493 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 439 more horse power than 1965 Saab MC. (54 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1965 Saab MC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1380 kg more than 1965 Saab MC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Saab MC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Ram (712 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 621 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Saab MC. (91 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2004 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Saab MC.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Ram | 1965 Saab MC | |
Make | Dodge | Saab |
Model | Ram | MC |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8276 cc | 841 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 493 HP | 54 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 712 Nm | 91 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 102.4 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100.6 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2268 kg | 888 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2500 mm |