2004 Dodge Ram vs. 1967 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2004 Dodge Ram is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Ram (493 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 455 more horse power than 1967 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1967 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1838 kg more than 1967 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Dodge Ram | 1967 Lotus Seven | |
| Make | Dodge | Lotus |
| Model | Ram | Seven |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 8276 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 493 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2268 kg | 430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 29 L |
