2004 Dodge Ram vs. 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2004 Dodge Ram is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Ram weights approximately 316 kg more than 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Because 2004 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Dodge Ram | 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Dodge | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Ram | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4703 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 235 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2466 kg | 2150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6350 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 107 L |
