2004 Dodge Ram vs. 1977 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2004 Dodge Ram is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 5,882 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Ram (305 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1977 Toyota Mark II. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1977 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1954 kg more than 1977 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Ram (753 Nm) has 583 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Toyota Mark II. (170 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Dodge Ram | 1977 Toyota Mark II | |
| Make | Dodge | Toyota |
| Model | Ram | Mark II |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5882 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 753 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 3149 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2020 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2590 mm |
