2004 Dodge Ram vs. 1983 Mitsubishi Pajero

To start off, 2004 Dodge Ram is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Ram (235 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1983 Mitsubishi Pajero. (83 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1983 Mitsubishi Pajero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Ram weights approximately 866 kg more than 1983 Mitsubishi Pajero. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Ram (407 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mitsubishi Pajero. (201 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mitsubishi Pajero.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Dodge Ram 1983 Mitsubishi Pajero
Make Dodge Mitsubishi
Model Ram Pajero
Year Released 2004 1983
Body Type Pickup SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4703 cc 2476 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 235 HP 83 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 407 Nm 201 Nm
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2466 kg 1600 kg
Vehicle Length 6350 mm 4610 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1950 mm 1840 mm
Wheelbase Size 4080 mm 2710 mm