2004 Dodge Ram vs. 1986 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2004 Dodge Ram is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 5,882 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1669 kg more than 1986 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2004 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Dodge Ram | 1986 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Dodge | Mercury |
| Model | Ram | Cougar |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5882 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 3149 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2650 mm |
