2004 Dodge Ram vs. 2008 Panoz Esperante
To start off, 2008 Panoz Esperante is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Panoz Esperante (305 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Ram. (235 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Panoz Esperante should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Ram.
Because 2004 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Panoz Esperante. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Panoz Esperante (434 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Ram. (407 Nm). This means 2008 Panoz Esperante will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Ram | 2008 Panoz Esperante | |
Make | Dodge | Panoz |
Model | Ram | Esperante |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 4589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 434 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6350 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 59 L |