2004 Dodge Ram vs. 2012 Kia Optima
To start off, 2012 Kia Optima is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Kia Optima (274 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Ram. (235 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Ram weights approximately 931 kg more than 2012 Kia Optima.
Because 2004 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Kia Optima. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Ram (407 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Kia Optima. (364 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Dodge Ram | 2012 Kia Optima | |
| Make | Dodge | Kia |
| Model | Ram | Optima |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4703 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 235 HP | 274 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 364 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2466 kg | 1535 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6350 mm | 4844 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1831 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2797 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 70 L |
