2004 Dodge Ram vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Ram would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1008 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Ram (407 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Dodge Ram | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Dodge | Mini |
| Model | Ram | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 235 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2466 kg | 1458 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6350 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 47 L |
