2004 Donkervoort D8 vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Donkervoort D8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Donkervoort D8 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Peugeot RCZ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot RCZ (163 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2004 Donkervoort D8. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 2004 Donkervoort D8.
Because 2004 Donkervoort D8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Donkervoort D8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Donkervoort D8 | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
Make | Donkervoort | Peugeot |
Model | D8 | RCZ |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 163 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 4287 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1359 mm |