2004 Eagle Vision vs. 1963 Riley 4
To start off, 2004 Eagle Vision is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Riley 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Riley 4 would be higher. At 2,698 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Eagle Vision (197 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1963 Riley 4. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1963 Riley 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Eagle Vision weights approximately 422 kg more than 1963 Riley 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Riley 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Riley 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Eagle Vision | 1963 Riley 4 | |
Make | Eagle | Riley |
Model | Vision | 4 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2698 cc | 1622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1148 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |