2004 Eagle Vision vs. 1966 Seat 600
To start off, 2004 Eagle Vision is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,698 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1966 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1966 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Eagle Vision weights approximately 995 kg more than 1966 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Eagle Vision | 1966 Seat 600 | |
Make | Eagle | Seat |
Model | Vision | 600 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2698 cc | 765 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |