2004 Eagle Vision vs. 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 2004 Eagle Vision is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Eagle Vision (197 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. (180 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280.
Because 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 has manual transmission. 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Eagle Vision | 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
| Make | Eagle | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Vision | 280 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2698 cc | 2778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 180 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1330 mm |
