2004 Eagle Vision vs. 1983 Holden Camira
To start off, 2004 Eagle Vision is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Holden Camira would be higher. At 2,698 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1983 Holden Camira. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1983 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Eagle Vision weights approximately 530 kg more than 1983 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Eagle Vision | 1983 Holden Camira | |
Make | Eagle | Holden |
Model | Vision | Camira |
Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2698 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |