2004 Eagle Vision vs. 1983 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Eagle Vision is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,698 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Celica. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Eagle Vision weights approximately 460 kg more than 1983 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Eagle Vision | 1983 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Eagle | Toyota |
Model | Vision | Celica |
Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2698 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1330 mm |