2004 Eagle Vision vs. 1992 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2004 Eagle Vision is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Fairlane (198 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2004 Eagle Vision. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2004 Eagle Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 40 kg more than 2004 Eagle Vision. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Eagle Vision | 1992 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Eagle | Ford |
Model | Vision | Fairlane |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2698 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |