2004 Eagle Vision vs. 1992 Mazda 626

To start off, 2004 Eagle Vision is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,698 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Eagle Vision (197 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 626. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Eagle Vision weights approximately 390 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 1992 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1992 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Eagle Vision 1992 Mazda 626
Make Eagle Mazda
Model Vision 626
Year Released 2004 1992
Body Type Sedan Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2698 cc 1840 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 197 HP 106 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1570 kg 1180 kg
Vehicle Length 5320 mm 4680 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1400 mm