2004 Eagle Vision vs. 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2004 Eagle Vision is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 2,698 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Eagle Vision weights approximately 720 kg more than 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Because 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Eagle Vision. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero has manual transmission. 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Eagle Vision | 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Eagle | Mitsubishi |
Model | Vision | Pajero |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2698 cc | 1100 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1400 mm |