2004 Eagle Vision vs. 1998 Lotus Emme

To start off, 2004 Eagle Vision is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Lotus Emme. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Lotus Emme would be higher. At 2,698 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 63 more horse power than 2004 Eagle Vision. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 2004 Eagle Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Eagle Vision weights approximately 892 kg more than 1998 Lotus Emme.

Because 1998 Lotus Emme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Lotus Emme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 1998 Lotus Emme has manual transmission. 1998 Lotus Emme will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: