2004 Ferrari Enzo vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2004 Ferrari Enzo is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 5,998 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Ferrari Enzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ferrari Enzo (653 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 587 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ferrari Enzo should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ferrari Enzo weights approximately 85 kg more than 1952 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ferrari Enzo (657 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 510 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2004 Ferrari Enzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ferrari Enzo | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
Make | Ferrari | Triumph |
Model | Enzo | Renown |
Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5998 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 653 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 657 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.2 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1365 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2750 mm |