2004 Ferrari Enzo vs. 2010 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2010 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ferrari Enzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ferrari Enzo would be higher. At 5,998 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Ferrari Enzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ferrari Enzo (653 HP) has 500 more horse power than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ferrari Enzo should accelerate faster than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 2004 Ferrari Enzo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ferrari Enzo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ferrari Enzo (657 Nm) has 420 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa. (237 Nm). This means 2004 Ferrari Enzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ferrari Enzo | 2010 Daewoo Tocsa | |
| Make | Ferrari | Daewoo |
| Model | Enzo | Tocsa |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5998 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 653 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 657 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 23 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
