2004 Fiat Ecobasis vs. 1966 Mercury Comet
To start off, 2004 Fiat Ecobasis is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 3,279 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Fiat Ecobasis (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1966 Mercury Comet. (118 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Ecobasis should accelerate faster than 1966 Mercury Comet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Comet weights approximately 322 kg more than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis.
Because 1966 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Ecobasis, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Comet (258 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis. (162 Nm). This means 1966 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Fiat Ecobasis | 1966 Mercury Comet | |
| Make | Fiat | Mercury |
| Model | Ecobasis | Comet |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 3279 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1662 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2950 mm |
