2004 Fiat Ecobasis vs. 1983 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2004 Fiat Ecobasis is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Fiat Ecobasis (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Ecobasis should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Fiat Ecobasis weights approximately 230 kg more than 1983 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Fiat Ecobasis (162 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (112 Nm). This means 2004 Fiat Ecobasis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Fiat Ecobasis | 1983 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Ecobasis | Tempo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 112 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1110 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2540 mm |
