2004 Fiat Ecobasis vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Fiat Ecobasis is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Fiat Ecobasis (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Ecobasis should accelerate faster than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 420 kg more than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis.
Because 2002 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis. (162 Nm). This means 2002 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Fiat Ecobasis | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Ecobasis | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 270 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1760 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 60 L |