2004 Fiat Ecobasis vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Fiat Ecobasis is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (164 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis. (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 75 kg more than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (207 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis. (162 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Fiat Ecobasis | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Ecobasis | 6 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 164 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 207 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1415 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 64 L |