2004 Fiat Ecobasis vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Fiat Ecobasis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Fiat Ecobasis would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 5 (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis. (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 5 (201 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis. (162 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis. 2009 Mazda 5 has automatic transmission and 2004 Fiat Ecobasis has manual transmission. 2004 Fiat Ecobasis will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda 5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Fiat Ecobasis | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
| Make | Fiat | Mazda |
| Model | Ecobasis | 5 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 201 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 60 L |
