2004 Fiat Ecobasis vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Fiat Ecobasis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Fiat Ecobasis would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis. (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis. (162 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Fiat Ecobasis | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Fiat | Mazda |
| Model | Ecobasis | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3010 mm |
