2004 Fiat Ecobasis vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Fiat Ecobasis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Fiat Ecobasis would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis. (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 3 weights approximately 38 kg more than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 3 (200 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis. (162 Nm). This means 2013 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Fiat Ecobasis.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Fiat Ecobasis | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Ecobasis | 3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 200 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1378 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 55 L |