2004 Fiat Idea vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2004 Fiat Idea is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 274 more horse power than 2004 Fiat Idea. (71 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2004 Fiat Idea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 725 kg more than 2004 Fiat Idea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Idea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Fiat Idea | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Idea | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 6964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1340 mm |